Arizona State University
Department of Exercise Science
and Physical Education
EPE 520: SPORT PSYCHOLOGY
Title & Course Number: Sport Psychology (EPE 520); Tuesdays, 5:40-8:30 p.m., (4 credits).
Instructor Information: Daniel M. Landers, Regents' Professor, PEBE 112, MTWTh 9:30-11:00 or by appointment, 965-7664 or 965-3913 (to leave a message), e-mail: Landers@asu.edu, website: http://www.public.asu.edu/~atdml
Catalogue Description: Current research in sport psychology with an emphasis on performance enhancement.. Includes questionnaire, psychophysiological, and behavioral research techniques.
Prerequisite: EPE 448 (Applied Sport Psychology) and EPE 500 (Research Methods)
Behavioral Objective: Given the opportunity to study assigned readings and lecture notes dealing with the knowledge of the course content and the opportunity to discuss the content in class, the student will be able to demonstrate that (s)he has an acceptable level of knowledge of the content by receiving an average passing grade based on all written exams, take-home assignments, class participation, and class project.
Textbook: None
Course Outline and Schedule
A. Course Structure/Orientation & History of the Field Aug. 22
Henry, Franklin (1978). The academic discipline of physical
education. Quest, 13-29.
Wiggins, David K. (1984). The history of sport in North
America. In J.M. Silva and R.S. Weinberg (Eds.), Psychological
foundations of sport. (pp. 9-22). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
B. Methodological Considerations Aug. 29
Hart, L.E. (1994). The role of evidence in promoting consensus
in the research literature on physical activity, fitness, and health.
In C. Bouchard, R.J. Shephard, & T. Stephens (Eds.), Physical
activity, fitness, and health. (pp. 89-97). Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics.
Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., & Sechrest, L. (1966).
Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences.
Chapter 1: Approximations of knowledge, (pp. 1-34). Chicago, IL:
Rand McNally.
C. Special Methodological Issues — Verbal Reports & Meta-Analysis Sept. 5
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we
can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological
Review, 84, 231-259.
Mann, C. (1990). Meta-analysis in the breech. Science, 249,
476-480.
D. Social Facilitation of Performance Sept. 12
Landers, D.M., & McCullagh, P.D. (1976). Social facilitation of
motor performance. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 4, 125-
162.
Bond, C.F., & Titus, L.J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-
analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
E. Arousal and Performance Sept. 19
Landers, D.M., & Arent, S.M. (in press). Arousal-performance
relationships. In J.M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology:
Personal growth to peak performance. (4th Edition). Mountain
View, CA: Mayfield.
F. Attention and Performance Sept. 27
Abernethy, B. (1993). Attention. In R.N. Singer, M. Murphey,
& L.K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport
psychology. (pp. 127-170). New York: McMillan.
_____________________________________________________
EXAM 1, OCTOBER 3
______________________________________________________
G. Psychophysiology, Biofeedback and Sport Performance Oct. 10
Hatfield, B.D., & Hillman, C.H. (in press). The psychophysiology
of sport. A mechanistic understanding of the psychology of
superior performance. In R.N. Singer, C.M. Janelle, & H.A.
Hausenblas (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology.
(75 pp.) New York: John Wiley.
Petruzzello, S.J., Landers, D.M., & Salazar, W. (1991).
Biofeedback and sport/exercise performance: Applications
and limitations. Behavior Therapy, 22, 379-392.
H. Modeling and Performance Oct. 17
McCullagh, P. , & Weiss, M.R. (in press). Considerations for motor
skill
performance and psychological responses. In R.N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblas,
& C.M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology.
New York: Wiley.
I. Mental Practice and Performance Oct. 24
Landers, D.M. (1991). "Cognitive-behavioral interventions"
In chapter entitled "Optimizing Individual Performance." In:
Bjork, R. & Druckman, D. In The Mind's Eye: Understanding
human performance. (pp. 203-224) Washington, D.C.: National
Academy Press.
Landers, D.M., Arent, S.M., Lutz, R.S., Romero, D.H., Slade,
J.M., McCullagh, P.D., & Ram, N. (2000). The effects of mental
practice on performance: Problems and practical recommendations.
Sport Science, 20(3, May),
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAM 2, OCTOBER 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Issues Regarding Relaxation and Meditation Nov. 7
Borkovec, T.D. & Sides, J.K. (1979). Procedural variables
related to the physiological effects of progressive relaxation:
A critical review. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 17,
119-125.
Benson, H., Beary, J.F., & Carol, M.P. (1974). The relaxation
response. Psychiatry, 37, 37-47.
Davidson, G. (1991). Meditation. In: Druckman, D. & Bjork,
R. (Eds.), In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance.
(pp. 120-133). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
K. Goal Setting and Performance Nov. 14
Kyllo, B.L. & Landers, D.M. (1995). Goal setting in sport and
exercise: A research synthesis to resolve the controversy. Journal
of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 117-137.
L. The Relationship of Self-Efficacy and Group Cohesiveness to Performance Nov. 21
Feltz, D.L. (1994). Self-confidence and performance. In: D.
Druckman & R.A. Bjork (Eds.), Learning, remembering,
believing: Enhancing human performance. (pp. 173-206).
Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Widmeyer, W.N., Carron, A.V., & Brawley, L.R. (1993). Group
cohesion in sport and exercise. In R.N. Singer, M. Murphey, &
L.K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology.
(pp. 672-692). New York: McMillan.
M. Catch-up on Readings and Presentation of Class Projects (20-30 min.) Nov. 28
N. Review for Final and Presentation
of Class Projects
Dec. 5
____________________________________________________
FINAL EXAM, DECEMBER 7, 5:40-7:45 p.m.
____________________________________________________
VIII. Evaluation Procedures:
A. Exams (60 pts.)
1. There
are two examinations and a comprehensive final examination.
The first and second exams are worth 15 points each and the final is worth
30 points. The final will be given at the scheduled time during finals
week
and it will be comprehensive with an emphasis on the class discussion and
test material in the last third of the course.
2. Exams will be
essay with approximately 4-5 questions in which to respond
within a two-hour time period.
3. Missed exams
cannot be made up (zero points) without arranging this with
the instructor within 2 weeks of the start of the semester or by having
a
properly documented excuse (e.g., physician's excuse).
4. Opportunity
for exam review (15-20 minutes) is provided during class time.
Exams may not be taken from the classroom.
5. Points are deducted for poor spelling, grammar, or responses in outline form.
B. Class Presentations (10 pts.)
1. Each student
will select two studies from the supplementary readings list and
present these in class. Students should have presentation materials
(slides,
proxima presentations, overhead transparencies, etc.) and each presentation
should take no longer than 20 minutes. The maximum score for each
presentation is 5 points.
C. Class Discussion (10 pts.)
1. Students are expected to participate in class discussions.
Attendance will be
taken and poor attendance, whether excused or not, will impact negatively
on one's ability to participate in class discussions. Likewise, good
attendance
accompanied by poor participation in class discussions will also adversely
affect the grade.
2. The instructor should be notified in advance if you plan to be absent,
tardy,
or have to leave class early. Coming late to class or leaving early
will also
adversely affect the class participation grade.
3. It is the student's responsibility to get all missed material,
announcements,
and assignments. For the assigned readings provided for you in the
Secretarial Office in PEBE (Room 107B), if pages are missing or are
not readable, students are expected to find the article in the library
and read
it there.
D. Class Project (20 pts.)
1.
The project can consist of a critical review of the literature or a research
proposal
on a topic that is approved by the course instructor. This project
must be approved
by the instructor by the September 19th class meeting. A type-written
paper of
approximately 20 pages should be turned into the instructor on the last
class meeting
(i.e., Dec. 5) . In addition, for the November 28th and December
5th class meetings,
each student should be prepared to present to the class a 20-30 minute
summary of
their class project.
E. Grading Plan
Exam 1(Oct. 3)
15 pts.
Exam 2 (Oct. 31)
15 pts.
Comprehensive Final Exam (Dec. 5)
30 pts.
Class Presentations
10 pts.
Class Participation
10 pts.
Class Project
20 pts.
100 pts.
100 - 88 = A
87.9 - 80 = B
79.9 - 70 = C
69.9 - 60 = D
below 60 = E