Jacquie Lynch
Honors 171
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales:
Towards Realism & Naturalism in Literature
"In the first place, as he is the father of English Poetry, I hold him
in the same degree of veneration as the Grecians held Homer, or the Romans
Virgil. He is a perpetual fountain of good sense; learned in all
sciences, and, therefore, speaks properly on all subjects. As he
knew what to say, so he knows also to leave off, a continence [habit] which
is practiced by few writers, and scarcely by any of the ancients, excepting
Virgil and Horace."
--John Dryden, from The Norton Anthology of English Literature
Lynchnotes to The Pilgrims:
29 + Chaucer (counting only 1 nun's priest) + two met along the way
-
Chaucer, a somewhat naïve poet
-
Knight, a genuinely chivalrous professional soldier who loves truth &
honor
-
Squire, the Knight's son, an up & coming knight & self-proclaimed
ladies’ man
-
Yeoman, the Knight & Squire's servant/woodsman
-
Prioress, a nun, Madame Eglantine, who seems more fashionable than devout
-
Second Nun, the Prioress' secretary
-
Nun's Priests, three priests accompany the prioress & second nun; only
one tells a tale
-
Monk, a jolly, gluttonous monk who hunts & spends much time outside
his monastery
-
Friar, Hubert, a "salesman" who works for his own benefit rather than for
the poor
-
Merchant, a well-dressed man who seems successful, but isn't--it's a cover
-
Clerk, a student at Oxford who (like a BHC student) is quiet, poor &
values books
-
Sergeant of Law, an able lawyer who is able to charge large fees for his
services
-
Franklin, a landowner who enjoys good food & is a very hospitable host
-
Haberdasher, Dyer, Carpenter, Weaver, Carpet Maker: well-dressed guildsmen
-
Cook, a great cook, but his hygiene leaves room for improvement
-
Shipman, huge, uncouth, a fine sailor but poor horseman
-
Doctor of Physic/Physician, happy to cure people, loves the gold he gets
to do so
-
Wife of Bath, an excellent weaver who has outlived 5 husbands & seeks
the 6th
-
Parson, poor but good, portrayed without irony as a good shepherd, a true
Christian
-
Plowman, the parson's brother, a peaceful, charitable, honest tenant farmer
-
Miller, named Robin, a thick, crude, rowdy man w/ a red beard, black nose,
& facial wart
-
Manciple, a less than honest law school steward in charge of purchasing
its food
-
Reeve, a skinny, bad-tempered ex-carpenter, now a shrewd manager
of a large estate
-
Summoner, a physically repugnant, corrupt church court servant who happily
accepts bribes
-
Pardoner, the nastiest of the pilgrims, a fast-talking, immoral seller
of indulgences
-
The Host of the Tabard Inn, Harry Bailey, who acts as the master of ceremonies
Additional Pilgrims (who join the group on the way to Canterbury):
-
The Canon, an alchemist
-
The Canon's Yeoman (servant)
Structural Devices for Developing Character:
A. Framing Device, "The General Prologue"
B. Linking Device, The Prologues to Each Pilgrim’s Tale
C. Linking Device, The Tale Each Pilgrim Tells
D. Relationships/Interactions between the Pilgrims
Focus Questions for the General Prologue:
-
As you read the General Prologue, refer to the Lynchnotes above and note
the details that foreshadow each pilgrim's character, class, degree of
integrity, etc. Look for ironic incongruities, such as when the pilgrim
Chaucer seems to be admiring a character, but the details given paint a
less than admirable picture.
-
Look for subtle and overt critiques of members of the clergy. All
of these characters are participating in a Christian pilgrimmage, but do
their characters reflect Christian principles?
-
Look for the ways that social class--and tensions between members of different
classes--are indicated through the representation of these diverse characters
and the way some of them interact with each other (e.g., who respects whom?
who goes out of his or her way to convey disrespect for others?).
Focus Questions for The Wife of
Bath's Prologue:
-
What's the Wife of Bath's thesis for
her prologue?
-
Does her thesis change, and/or argue
against itself--and if so, where?
-
Are her views feminist, anti-feminist,
or a problematic mix of both?