Keith W. Kintigh
Professor, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Senior Sustainability Scientist, ASU Global Institute of Sustainability
See also Kintigh's ASU Directory Page.Kintigh's Archaeological Software Package: Tools for Quantitative Archaeology (not an ASU web site)
Kintigh et al. 2018 Data Integration in the Service of Synthetic Research. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 6(1): 30-41.
Altschul et al. 2017 Fostering Synthetic Research in Archaeology to Advance Science and Benefit Society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(42): 10999-01002
McManamon et al. 2017 tDAR: A Cultural Heritage Archive for Twenty-First-Century Public Outreach, Research, and Resource Management.. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 5(1): 1-121.
Kintigh et al. 2015 Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data: Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3(1):1-15.
Hegmon et al. 2014 The Human Experience of Social Change and Continuity: The Southwest and North Atlantic in “Interesting Times” ca. 1300.. In Climates of Change: The Shifting Environments of Archaeology, pp. 53-68. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary.
Kintigh et al. 2014 Grand Challenges for Archaeology. American Antiquity 79(1): 5-24.
Kintigh et al. 2014 Grand Challenges for Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(3): 879-880.
Kintigh 2013 Sustaining Database Semantics. In CAA 2010: Fusion of Cultures BAR International Series 2494: 585-589.
Spielmann and Kintigh 2011 the Digital Archaeological Record: The Potentials of Archaeozoological Data Integration through tDAR. SAA Archaeological Record. 11(1) 22-25.
Kintigh (ed.) 2006 The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71(3): 567-578.
Kintigh 2006 Ceramic Dating and Type Associations. In Managing Archaeological Data: Essays in Honor of Sylvia W. Gaines, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers 57: 17-26.
Papalas, Clark and Kintigh 2003 Liencres Revisited: The Significance of Spatial Patterning Revealed by Unconstrained Clustering. In In Mesolithic on the Move: Papers Presented at the Sixth International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Stockholm 2000, pp. 253-261.
Gregg et al. 1991 Linking ethnoarchaeological interpretation and archaeological data: The sensitivity of spatial analytical methods to post-depositional disturbance. In The Archaeological Interpretation of Spatial Patterns, pp. 149-196.
Kintigh 1990 Intrasite Spatial Analysis: A Commentary on Major Methods. In Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, edited by Albertus Voorrips. Studies in Modern Archaeology 3: 165-200.