Jordan, P. W., Makatchev, M., & VanLehn, K. (2004). Combining competing language understanding approaches in an intelligent tutoring system. In J. C.  Lester, R. M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu, (Eds.), 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 346-357).  Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

When implementing a tutoring system that attempts a deep understanding of students’ natural language explanations, there are three basic approaches to choose between; symbolic, in which sentence strings are parsed using a lexicon and grammar; statistical, in which a corpus is used to train a text classifier; and hybrid, in which rich, symbolically produced features supplement statistical training. Because each type of approach requires different amounts of domain knowledge preparation and provides different quality output for the same input, we describe a method for heuristically combining multiple natural language understanding approaches in an attempt to use each to its best advantage. We explore two basic models for combining approaches in the context of a tutoring system; one where heuristics select the first satisficing representation and another in which heuristics select the highest ranked representation.

For a PDF full article version, click here (150KB).