I plan to develop a 3D image showing bedrock shapes and structures under a portion of Phoenix based on information from several wells that have been drilled in the area of interest.
Steve Reynolds recently published a paper on this topic. He has provided a copy of his PDF file which contains a table of ground surface and bedrock elevations. He has also provided a Word document with a table showing the coordinates of each well.
Here is an example of the data in the well coordinates file:
"SITE_ID","XCoord","YCoord","Coord_Sys","MP_Elev","Total_Depth" "DM301",482808.1875,896181.625,"Sta",1212.86,123 "DM302",482854.09375,896152.3125,"Sta",1212.46,124 "DM303",482748,896438.8125,"Sta",1209.43,105 "DM304",482746.5,896388.125,"Sta",1209.19,105 "DM305",480607.59375,896763.375,"Sta",1185.73,118 "DM306",480391.1875,896527.3125,"Sta",1181.04,120 "DM307",480269.1875,896232.125,"Sta",1177.64,140 "DM308",480231.3125,895913.6875,"Sta",1177.63,145 "DM309",480233.3125,895573.8125,"Sta",1174.88,167 "DM310",480233.6875,895253.8125,"Sta",1175.17,155 "DM311",480224.59375,894933.875,"Sta",1173.36,120 "DM312",480226.59375,894614,"Sta",1171.41,113 "DM313",480228.5,894294,"Sta",1169.71,105 |
These records appear suitable for my project, because they show both the location of the well (in X and Y coordinates) and information about elevation and depth. Of the 1011 rows in the table, however, many appear to be missing either location or depth information. With further analysis, then, I may need to eliminate rows which do not contain enough information to be useful in this project.
The data will help answer these questions by making it possible to construct a digital model of surface and bedrock topography.
|
|
|