|
Congratulations to all of you for an
excellent poster presentation session. Department of Computer Science and
Engineering in recognition of your efforts will award certificates of
merit to “all” projects. Additionally two of the project groups have
been selected as the best and runner-up projects of Spring 2004. The
selection of the two projects was done by a panel consisting of Dr. Partha Dasgupta, Dr. Sandeep Gupta, and Dr. Hasan
Cam.
The project titled “Development of a reliable service
scheduler in distributed web-service environment” with team members Ethan Towne, John Bouchard, Daniel
Richard, and Bradley Tiffany has been judged as the “Best Capstone Project” for
Spring 2004.
The project titled “Hardware versus Software Trade-off
for AES Encryption Algorithm” with team members Logan Hall, Supreet Nagi, Jon Sargeant, and Sirish Shetty has been judged as the “Runner-up Capstone Project” for
Spring 2004.
The entire class must get in touch
with Kathleen Fretwell (Kathleen.fretwell@asu.edu) in CSE main office to collect their
certificates.
![*]()
Course Description
(Syllabus: pdf
file)
The students will be organized in
groups of three, and given a choice of projects and faculty advisors. The
students will work closely with their faculty advisors to implement the
project. The project will involve a major design experience based on the
knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating
engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the
following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability;
manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political.
The students will submit individual
bi-weekly reports and present weekly seminars (one to three student groups
per week). The reports will outline the progress of the project through
analysis, design, implementation and testing phases. Additionally, the
students will also submit a detailed mid-term report. At the end of the
course the students will be make a final report, oral presentation and
poster session for their project.
The student will be graded
individually on their bi-weekly reports and presentations (including
weekly and final). The students will be graded as a group for the mid-term
report, final report and poster. The final presentation and report will be
graded by invited industry representatives. The individual bi-weekly
reports will be graded by the project advisors and returned to the
students. The presentations will be graded by the instructor through a
presentation evaluation form that will be returned to the students.
Pre-requisites
q
Digital design fundamentals
q
High-level programming language
q
CSE 422
Textbook
(optional)
q
Strunk and White,
“The Elements of Style”, MacMillan Publishing
Co., inc
Instructor
Dr. Karam S.
Chatha,
GWC 352,
Department of Computer Science and
Engineering,
Arizona State University.
Email: Karam.Chatha@asu.edu
Web: http://www.eas.asu.edu/~kchatha
Phone: 480-7277850
Office
Hours
Tuesdays and Thursdays from 4.30 pm to 5.30
pm (or by appointment).
Teaching
Assistant
Krishnan Srinivasan
Email: ksrini@asu.edu
Office: BYENG 589
Office hours: Wednesday: 1.00 – 2.30 pm
Evaluation Policy
1.
Individual bi-weekly reports – 15 %
2.
Weekly presentations – 15 %
3.
Mid-term report – 15 %
4.
Final report – 20 %
5.
Final presentation – 20 %
6.
Final poster – 15 %
7.
Evaluation sheet: pdf file
Grading
Policy
1.
Final score >= 85 % : A
2.
70 % <= Final score < 85 % : B
3.
50 % <= Final score < 70% : C
4.
Final score < 50 % : F
Project
Topics
Group 1: Development of interactive
games on the PocketPC platform.
Group 2: Design and implement the
start-up hyperfind feature in the
editor
Group 3: Development of a reliable
service scheduler in distributed web-service environment
Group 4: Perform HW versus SW
trade-off for the DCT and FFT signal processing algorithms.
Group 5:
Programmable sensor for vehicle parking.
Group 6: Perform HW versus SW
trade-off for the AES encryption/decryption algorithm
Group 7: Analyze, Document, and
Improve the AVR Thermal Implementation
Group 8: Networking of PDA devices
through RF transceivers
Group 9: Perform HW versus SW
trade-off for the VLD and IP-lookup algorithms
Group 10: Interface enhancements to the DynAMOS framework
Group 11: Analyze, Document, and Improve the
Reference AVR Implementation
|