State Climate Update for
Conditions through February
2006
Based
upon analysis by the Monitoring Group of the Governor’s Drought Task Force,
precipitation data are stratified into the following drought categories for the
7 climate divisions for
Numerical Category |
Description |
Precipitation Percentile |
0 |
no drought |
40.01 – 100 |
1 |
abnormally dry |
25.01 – 40.00 |
2 |
moderate drought |
15.01 – 25.00 |
3 |
severe drought |
5.01 – 15.00 |
4 |
extreme drought |
0.00 – 5.00 |
SHORT TERM CONDITIONS: 1-6 MONTHS
Recent warm and very
dry conditions continued during February across
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
PDSI |
CD1 |
85.7 |
29.5 (1) |
70.5 |
CD2 |
65.2 |
3.6 (4) |
8.0 |
CD3 |
90.2 |
9.8 (3) |
9.8 |
CD4 |
73.2 |
2.7 (4) |
5.4 |
CD5 |
82.1 |
24.1 (2) |
87.5 |
CD6 |
92.0 |
3.6 (4) |
4.5 |
CD7 |
83.0 |
7.1 (3) |
8.9 |
FEBRUARY 2006: percentiles of temperature,
precipitation (with
drought category),
and Palmer Drought Severity Index
for the 7
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
92.0 |
2.7 (4) |
CD2 |
74.1 |
0.9 (4) |
CD3 |
92.0 |
0.9 (4) |
CD4 |
84.8 |
0.9 (4) |
CD5 |
92.0 |
0.9 (4) |
CD6 |
97.3 |
0.9 (4) |
CD7 |
91.5 |
0.9 (4) |
DECEMBER 2005 - FEBRUARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
91.0 |
4.5 (4) |
CD2 |
84.7 |
0.9 (4) |
CD3 |
91.9 |
0.9 (4) |
CD4 |
88.3 |
0.9 (4) |
CD5 |
96.4 |
14.9 (3) |
CD6 |
99.1 |
0.9 (4) |
CD7 |
92.8 |
0.9 (4) |
SEPTEMBER 2005 – FEBRUARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
INTERMEDIATE TERM CONDITIONS: 12-24 MONTHS
The intermediate time
periods of 1 and 2 years define the break point in the more recent drought
conditions. The past 12 months have been marked by dryness characteristic of
“extreme drought” across 5 of the 7
There is very little
evidence of drought within the state when examining precipitation totals for
the past 2 years. Only one region registered precipitation totals suggestive of
drought; precipitation for southeastern
Temperatures across
the state were well above normal for the past 2 years, and most significantly
so across southern
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
82.9 |
20.7 (2) |
CD2 |
81.1 |
4.5 (4) |
CD3 |
86.9 |
5.0 (4) |
CD4 |
79.3 |
1.8 (4) |
CD5 |
91.9 |
31.1 (1) |
CD6 |
98.2 |
3.6 (4) |
CD7 |
91.9 |
0.9 (4) |
MARCH 2005 – FEBRUARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
85.5 |
90.0 (0) |
CD2 |
90.0 |
67.3 (0) |
CD3 |
89.1 |
77.3 (0) |
CD4 |
95.5 |
49.1 (0) |
CD5 |
91.8 |
95.0 (0) |
CD6 |
95.5 |
72.7 (0) |
CD7 |
87.7 |
22.7 (2) |
MARCH 2004 – FEBURARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
LONG TERM CONDITIONS: 36-48 MONTHS
The pattern of
precipitation rankings for the longer-term 3-year period across the state
closely matches that for the past 2-year period. The 36-month precipitation
totals were above average for 5 of the 7 climate divisions in
Dryness is more
evident for the longer 4-year period. Only two regions of the state
(northwestern (CD 1) and southwestern (CD 5)) are characterized by 4-year
precipitation totals that are above average, while three regions of the state
(northeastern (CD 2), west-central (CD 3), south-central (CD 6)) can be
characterized as “abnormally dry” over the past 4 years. The long-term
problematic areas within the state are the east-central (CD 4) and southeastern
(CD 7) regions, where 4-year precipitation totals are suggestive of “severe
drought” conditions.
Temperatures for the
period were well above the historical median; however, to some extent the
longer time periods likely reflect the general climatic changes of the past
several decades in addition to the recent warmth that typically accompanies
dryness in
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
84.4 |
77.1 (0) |
CD2 |
90.8 |
50.0 (0) |
CD3 |
93.6 |
57.8 (0) |
CD4 |
97.3 |
20.2 (2) |
CD5 |
90.8 |
88.1 (0) |
CD6 |
95.4 |
52.3 (0) |
CD7 |
92.7 |
10.1 (3) |
MARCH 2003 – FEBRUARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
|
Temperature |
Precipitation |
CD1 |
87.0 |
51.9 (0) |
CD2 |
91.7 |
33.3 (1) |
CD3 |
97.2 |
33.3 (1) |
CD4 |
98.2 |
9.3 (3) |
CD5 |
96.8 |
75.0 (0) |
CD6 |
98.2 |
26.9 (1) |
CD7 |
99.1 |
8.3 (3) |
MARCH 2002 – FEBRUARY 2006:
percentiles of temperature,
and precipitation (with
drought category) for the 7
climate divisions
SUMMARY
●
The recent warm and extremely dry conditions continued
across the entire state of
●
Precipitation totals for recent months are extremely low, with the entire state
characterized by amounts indicative of “severe” to “extreme” short-term drought
over the past 1 to 6 months.
●
The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) has fallen dramatically since the wet
winter of 2004-05. The PDSI indicates moist conditions only along the western
edge of the state (CDs 1 and 5); elsewhere, the PDSI signals very dry
conditions.
●
The past 12 months have been marked by dryness
characteristic of “extreme drought” across 5 of the 7
●
There is very little evidence of drought within the
state when examining precipitation totals for the past 2 years; drought is
evident only across southeastern
●
The 36-month precipitation totals were above average
for 5 of the 7 climate divisions in
● The
long-term problematic areas within the state are the east-central and
southeastern regions, where 4-year precipitation totals are suggestive of
“severe drought” conditions.