CSE 591 Autonomous Agents, Fall 04
The reading list of papers, book chapters and slides.
Describing actions, effects and the environment (10 classes)
*** M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz,
Representing action and change by logic programs,
Journal of Logic Programming, Vol. 17, 1993, pp. 301-321.
C. Baral. Chapter 5 of the book:
Knowledge representation, reasoning and declarative problem solving.
Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz:
Action Languages
. Electronic
Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (1998), Issue 3-4, pp.
193-210. http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/etai/1998/007/.
*** G. Neelakantan Kartha,
Soundness and Completeness Theorems for Three Formalizations of Action
.
IJCAI 1993: 724-731
*** Paolo Liberatore:
The Complexity of the Language A
. Electronic
Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1 (1997), Issue 1-3, pp. 13-38.
http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/etai/1997/002/.
Reasoning about Effects of Concurrent Actions.
C. Baral, and M. Gelfond.
In Journal of Logic Programming, vol 31(1-3), pgs 85-117, 1997.
*
Abstract.
*
The version in Journal of Logic Programming. (postscript)
(A thoroughly revised version of an IJCAI 93 paper.)
*** G. N. Kartha and V. Lifschitz,
Actions with indirect effects (preliminary report),
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Principles of
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 1994, pp. 341-350.
Reasoning about actions: non-deterministic effects, constraints, and qualification.
Chitta Baral.
*
Abstract.
*
IJCAI 95, pgs 2017-2023. (postscript)
*** H. Turner,
Representing actions in logic programs and default theories: A situation calculus approach
,
Journal of Logic Programming, Vol. 31, pp. 245-298, 1997.
Representing Actions: Laws, Observation and Hypothesis.
C. Baral, M. Gelfond, and A. Provetti.
In Journal of Logic Programming, Vol 31(1-3), 201-243, 1997.
*
Abstract.
*
The version in Journal of Logic Programming. (postscript)
Formalizing narratives using nested circumscription.
C. Baral, A. Gabaldon and A. Provetti.
In Artificial Intelligence journal, 104/1-2, pages 107-164, Sept 1998.
*
Abstract.
*
Version that appears in the Artificial Intelligence journal. (postscript)
*
The AAAI 96 version, pgs 652-657. (postscript)
Formalizing sensing actions -- a transition function based approach.
C. Baral and T. Son.
In Artificial Intelligence Journal, 125 (1-2), pgs 19-91, Jan 2001.
*
Abstract.
*
Version to appear in Artificial Intelligence Journal (postscript)
*
Technical report with all the proofs. (postscript)
*
A subset of it that appears in the International logic programming Symposium (ILPS), pgs 387-401, 1997. (postscript)
Formulating diagnostic problem solving using an action language with narratives and sensing.
Chitta Baral, Sheila McIlraith, and Tran Cao Son.
*
Abstract.
*
In KR 2000, pgs 311-322. (postscript)
Computational complexity of planning and approximate planning in presence of incompleteness.
C. Baral, V. Kreinovich, and R. Trejo.
In Artificial Intelligence Journal, 122(1-2),241-267, 2000.
*
Abstract.
* Initial version appeared in IJCAI 99, pgs 948-953.
*
Version in Artificial Intelligence Journal (postscript)
Ch 4 and 6 from the book Heteregenous Agent Systems by Subrahmanian et al.
MIT press, 2000.
R. Reiter.
Natural actions, concurrency and continuous time in the situation calculus
.
In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (KR'96) ,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A. November 5-8, 1996.
R. Reiter.
The frame problem in the situation calculus: A simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression.
Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy,
Vladimir Lifschitz (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991, pp.359-380.
Patrick Doherty, Joakim Gustafsson, Lars Karlsson, and Jonas Kvarnström,
TAL: Temporal Action Logics Language Specification and Tutorial
.
Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (1998), Issue 3-4, pp. 273-306.
http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/etai/1998/009/.
PDDL2.1.
D. Long and M. Fox.
Describing goals and directives (5 classes)
***
Goal specification in presence of non-deterministic actions.
C. Baral and Jicheng Zhao.
In proceedings of ECAI'04, pages 273-277.
***
Computational Complexity of Planning with Temporal Goals.
C. Baral et al.
DRAFT.
Logical specification of goals.
R. Niyogi and S. Sarkar.
3rd international conference on Information Technology. pgs 77-82.
Using Temporal Logics to Express Search Control Knowledge for Planning,
F. Bacchus and F. Kabanza, Artificial Intelligence volume 16, pages 123--191, 2000.
Planning for Temporally Extended Goals
,
F. Bacchus and F. Kabanza,
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, pages 5--27, 1998.
Computational Complexity of Planning with Temporal Goals.
C. Baral, V. Kreinovich and R. Trejo.
To appear in IJCAI 2001.
Maintainability: a weaker stabilizability like notion for high level control.
Mutsumi Nakamura, Chitta Baral and Marcus Bjareland.
*
Abstract.
*
In AAAI 2000, pgs 62-67. (postscript)
Describing complex plans and agent architectures (7 classes)
Maintenance goals of agents in a dynamic environment: formulation and policy construction.
Chitta Baral, Thomas Eiter, Marcus Bjareland and Mutsumi Nakamura.
Revised version of an AAAI'02 and an ICAPS'04 paper. Submitted to a journal.
Planning with domain-dependent knowledge of different kinds -- an answer set programming approach.
Tran Cao Son, Chitta Baral and Sheila McIlraith.
To appear in LPNMR'01.
Reasoning agents in dynamic domains.
C. Baral and M. Gelfond.
*
Abstract.
*
To appear in ``Logic based AI'' (postscript)
editor J. Minker. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Relating theories of actions and reactive control
C. Baral and T. Son.
In ETAI (Electronic transactions of AI), 2(3-4):211-271, 1998.
*
Abstract.
*
The initial version. (postscript)
*
The current version -- shortened and revised. (postscript)
*
The ETAI version.
.
From theory to practice: the UTEP robot in AAAI 96 and 97 robot contests.
C. Baral, L. Floriano, A. Hardesty, D. Morales, M. Nogueira, and T.C. Son
*
Abstract.
*
In Proc. of the second international conference on automated agents (Agents 98), 32-38. (in postscript)
H.J. Levesque, R. Reiter, Y. Lespérance, F. Lin and R. Scherl.
GOLOG: A Logic Programming Language for Dynamic Domains.
Journal of Logic Programming, 31, 59-84, 1997.
G. De Giacomo, R. Reiter and M. Soutchanski.
Execution monitoring of high-level robot programs.
Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (KR'98).
Raymond Reiter, Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems.
MIT Press, 2001. (Chapter 6)
Chapter 6 from the book Heteregenous Agent Systems by Subrahmanian et al. MIT press, 2000.
Agents in uncertain and stochastic environments. (7 classes)
Reasoning about actions in a probabilistic setting.
C. Baral and L. Tuan.
In Common Sense 2001.
Towards feasible approach to plan checking under probabilistic uncertainty.
Raul Trejo, Vladik Kreinovich and Chitta Baral.
*
Abstract.
*
In AAAI 2000, pgs 545-550. (postscript)
High-Level Planning and Control with Incomplete Information Using POMDPs
H. Geffner and B. Bonet. Proceedings Fall AAAI Symposium on Cognitive Robotics, 1998.
Solving Large POMDPs by Real Time Dynamic Programming
H. Geffner and B. Bonet. Working Notes Fall AAAI Symposium on POMDPS. 1998. (Abstract)
The Frame Problem and Bayesian Network Action Representations
Craig Boutilier and Moises Goldszmidt Appeared, CSCSI-96, Toronto, May 1996.
Decision-Theoretic, High-level Agent Programming in the Situation Calculus
Craig Boutilier, Ray Reiter, Mikhail Soutchanski and Sebastian Thrun. AAAI 2000.
Reasoning about Noisy Sensors and Effectors in the Situation Calculus
,
F. Bacchus, J. Y. Halpern, and H. J. Levesque, Artificial Intelligence vol 111, pages 171-208, 1999..
Symbolic Dynamic Programming for First-order MDPs
,
Craig Boutilier, Ray Reiter and Bob Price
IJCAI-01.