TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Lessons of the Cu Chi Tunnels
By Caroline Park
I hadn’t
planned
on visiting the Cu
Chi Tunnels during our stay in Vietnam,
but when a friend asked me to go on the first day there, I shrugged and
thought
why not. After having lunch at a pho
restaurant, we asked the owner how
we
could get to the tunnels. In very good
English, she told us it was quite far and the best way would be by
taxi. She
graciously offered to call us a taxi from a company that she knew
wouldn’t try
to rip us off. We accepted.
Within a
couple
of minutes a white
SUV taxi pulled over and the five of us climbed in. Our driver took us
through Ho Chi Minh City
and out
of it headed for Cu Chi. I gazed out of the window the whole time,
taking in
everything that I could see from my limited view. People were pushing
carts,
people were selling things, men young and old were working in a
construction
site lifting heavy concrete blocks. Hundreds of motorbikes passed us by. The hustle and bustle of HCMC was familiar
yet fascinating. We didn’t talk much during the ride to Cu Chi. All of us were in a trance, staring out at a
city that was full of life but had been war torn only a couple of
decades
ago. I couldn’t imagine the city in war
but while we were passing by I noticed the wreckage of several
buildings that
had not yet been reconstructed. The traces
reminded me of the skeletons of a long decomposed body.
Forgotten, yet visible.
As we drew
nearer, I asked myself,
“what exactly are we going to see at the Cu Chi Tunnels?”
I only knew vaguely that it was a
reconstruction of a tunnel that had been used by the Viet Cong during
the war
and I wasn’t prepared for “a commercialized transnational public space
for the
consumption of a multisensory ‘Vietcong’ experience” that Christina
Schwenkel
describes
in her article "Recombinant History: Transnational Practices of Memory
and Knowledge Production in Contemporary Vietnam". As soon as my group crossed the street into
the “jungle,” I felt the construction of memory and history at work.
First, we
were
ushered to the
“original” entry to the tunnel. We
joined a large group of Canadians and I watched a young girl around the
age of
ten climb into the entry hole. “Ouch,”
she exclaimed as her elbow bumped the ground while she tried slithering
into
the constrained space. She held the
wooden door above her head as her parents snapped pictures. Then we were herded to the second attraction:
a broken down U.S.
army tank half sunken in the mud. The
Vietnamese guide explained that the tank had caught on fire and as the U.S.
soldiers climbed out, they were shot on the spot by surrounding VCs. Shutters of cameras opened and shut and the
tourists formed a line to take pictures on the tank, including the
group I was
with.
As I joined
them
on top of that
tank, I couldn’t figure out what kind of meaning this relic held for
the people
who coming to encounter this “‘implied’ experience that ‘operated in
the realm
of the imaginary’” (Schwenkel 9). Did the
people, foreign or Vietnamese, come here to feel the realness of a past
and
gruesome war? What kind of meaning does
this place and places such as this hold for travelers who stop by? Schwenkel asserts that foreigners who come to Vietnam
in search of traces of the war express disappointment at the lack of
remnants
(8). Therefore, is Vietnam’s tourist industry
spurred
by an international demand in a globalizing world where people from one
side of
the globe come by the other side in search of an exotic and tragic
history? To me the Cu Chi Tunnels were a
reminder of a horrendous event that should never take place again.
|