TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Crossing the Globe: One Person at
a Time
By
Rip Ritchie
Introduction
Migration has been evident in every country that I have
traveled to in
this circumnavigation of the globe. It is now obvious to me that
it is a worldwide phenomenon that pervades the economic and social
fabric of every society on the earth. It can be called
globalization, or it can be referred to as human nature, but either way
migration describes the evolution of human history. From the
earliest origins of the human species, people have been spreading out
across the land and transporting our species to ever crevice of our
planet. We are a like all living things, even a virus, that has
an interest in survival. Resources are essential to our survival
and the original migration of humans reflects a need to access these
resources. Intense competition in one specific geographic
location leads to movement for easier or more reliable access to
necessities. As production mechanisms shifted from nomadic and hunting
and gathering to a more sedentary lifestyle, like agriculture, some of
this original migration slowed down. People stayed in a location
because their mode of production increased the availability of
resources. A specialization of labor led to the development of urban
areas and distinct population centers. With this security, populations
increased and put new stresses on human populous. People were
further removed from actual attainment of essential resources and the
mode of production became increasingly complicated.
In the modern world, the system of production and
distribution to populations around the globe has become incredibly
sophisticated. This is where the system of globalization comes
into play. Food that is grown in Brazil can be used to supply
citizens in Europe with their essential resources. Furthermore,
because of the specialization of labor and industry a person in
Pittsburgh can be essential for the transport of these resources from
one location to another. This makes access to resources very
complicated and inequalities have developed around the globe.
Some areas have developed more intensely than others and have a greater
access to these resources. In this sense, there are countries and
areas around the world that are centers of access. It does not
matter where the areas of production are in the modern world, just the
areas of access. For this reason, many people around the world
cannot attain the resources they need for their families and themselves
to survive. Migration does not serve as a solution to this
problem in the poorest areas of the world. They have no means of
transport and no existing connections to areas of high-access.
The areas of high migration are hence from moderately developed regions
of the world where large amounts of the population cannot access
resources because access is limited. When this is the case, many
individuals choose to migrate to a highly developed country where
access to resources will be more available. This process
characterizes migration in the modern world. People are migrating
from areas of middle to high development so that they can have a better
chance of accessing resources.
These two examples show some of the specific cases of migration that I
witnessed while crossing the globe. They follow this trend of
modern migration and help to illustrate some of the different factors
and situations that lead individuals to migrate.
Analysis
These two cases show modern examples of the movement
of people around the globe. The first example illustrates the
migration of Filipinos to Hong Kong. As I wandered around the
streets of Hong Kong, it was incredibly obvious to me that there was a
large amount of migration to the area. I was lucky to be in the
city on a Sunday, because it is the traditional day off for Filipino
migrant women. They infiltrate certain areas of the city and make
their presence incredibly obvious. These women have come to Hong
Kong in search of work. They cannot access employment in their
home country and therefore cannot access the necessary resources to
survive. Because there is a large amount of development and
wealth in Hong Kong, the availability of jobs for maids is large.
It is the need on both ends of the spectrum that creates this
exchange. There is opportunity in Hong Kong and this brings the
Filipino women. Most of these women receive good wages in
contrast to comparable employment in the Philippines. They are
able to live in Hong Kong and work while simultaneously sending money
back to their homes so that their families can support themselves and
survive.
Most of these women are obviously discriminated
against in Hong Kong. For Schiller, Basch and Blanc-Szanton in
their article “Transnationalism: A New Analytical Framework for
Understanding Migration”, this is an inevitability of this
migration. People tend to have misconceptions about why people
are migrating and do not understand the process well. Many people
consider these people to be less intelligent because they are coming
and working lower-level jobs such as being a maid. They think
these people want to leave their country in order to find a new
life. This is not true of the situation. Schiller, Basch and
Blanc-Szanton explain how the new migrant “maintain multiple relations:
familial, economic, social, organizational, religious, and political
that span borders.” These migrants are not people just seeking a
new life, but are moving out of necessity. They do not want to
leave home and maintain many connections. They do not want to
assimilate to Hong Kong culture and society because they love the
Philippines and their family there. They are still very much
connected to the Philippines with their families and creating cultural
ties that span international boundaries. Because of these ties,
there is a cultural exchange between the country of origin and the
receiving country. The Filipino women are having a distinct
unintended impact on the culture of Hong Kong.
This is a new form of migration that is occurring
around the world. With new forms of communication and
transportation, it is possible for migrants to stay incredibly
connected with their place of origin. Instead of moving to access
resources in a place where they are more readily accessible, people can
now move to these places and send some of the accessibility back to
their families and home countries. The implications of this sort
of exchange are immense. Cultures and traditions are flowing
across the globe, as assimilation is not the only option for
migrants. Filipino society can now exist in Hong Kong in a small
enclave because the women do not have to assimilate to be Hong
Kong. This affects the people that they are in contact with,
which happen to be a lot because of their incredibly visible presence
on a weekly basis. Issues such as race and discrimination do not
play as big of a role in this situation because it does not affect
their ability to access resources. It is a form of temporary
migration with their options being clearly understood. They are
not assimilating and trying to make a permanent and generational spot
in the receiving society.
The form of migration that I witnessed in Turkey is
a part of the informal economy. These women that are trafficked
to be sex workers are not legal migrants and official residents in
Turkey. They are often tricked into leaving their country and get
stuck in the destination country. When talking to one of the
workers, she left for the same reasons that other migrants are leaving
their countries. She is a fairly well educated woman with a
college degree, but could not get employment. Without a job, she
could not access the resources that she needed to survive. She
had attempted to go to Turkey to seek employment and had been trapped
into sexual enslavement.
Saskia Sassen talks about the movement of people
like this in her article “Migration policy: from control to
governance.” She explains that borders and border policy is often
not effective in
curbing the flow of migrants. It is the
conditions in both the sending and receiving countries that creates the
movement trends. In this case, it is the breakdown of the former
Soviet Union that has helped to facilitate the movement. Rita
said that there is absolutely no problem in being transported out of
Russia and into Turkey or any other country in the region. This
is one of the reasons that she decided to leave and seek employment,
because it is easy. It seems to me that if the borders were more
difficult to cross, the process could be more expensive and
prohibiting. Women, however, would continue to be
trafficked. Sassen describes that militarizing borders and
increasing control does not stop this movement. Though, if the
process was more formal it might contribute to more forms of legal
migration. It is a possibility that this woman would not have
been enslaved and could have migrated to Turkey or some other country
and found employment in a safe and desirable manner.
When talking to this woman I also thought it was
very interesting how she maintained her Russian identity. She
spoke English, which helped her to talk to potential customers, but
otherwise she only spoke Russian. She was not interested in
learning Turkish because she was not interested in assimilating in the
slightest. There were other Russian girls there, and she would
talk to them in her native tongue. This appears to be her only
method of fighting her enslavement. Amitava Kumar discusses this
issue of language use in his article “Passport Photos.” He talks
about how migrants often use their language to hold on to their
previous identity. It is a means for the migrant to actively
express their original culture and identity. In this case, it may
be the only way that this woman can continue to identify with her past
because she is being forced to live in this new culture. Language
is a very powerful means of self-identification. Even though this
woman is being enslaved in Turkey, she will continue to be
Russian. She is proud of who she is and has no desire to
change. Perhaps one day she will be freed and will not have lost
the characteristics that have shaped who she is for most of her
life.
Conclusion
These two examples help to show real-life
examples
of forms of migration from around the world. The women
from the
Philippines exemplify the modern processes that are occurring around
the world. They cannot access resources in their home country
appropriately so they are moving somewhere else where access is more
abundant. The woman in Turkey is doing the same thing, but
characterizes another form of the process. Her situation is a
negative aspect of the global migratory process. She was
interested in leaving because she could not attain necessities, but was
caught in the process. She was put into an undesirable and
unknown form of employment because the mechanisms that made her leave
left her vulnerable.
Both of these cases show how people are moving
around the world. These people are leaving out of necessity, not
because they want to start a new life somewhere else. Most of
them also have hopes or plans to return to their country of
origin. They create connections to their home country that create
an exchange that crosses international boundaries. Cultures are
being mixed and language, ideas and practices are infiltrating new
parts of the world. Both the receiving and sending countries are
changing because of this process. In history, people would
migrate outwards and have limited means of communication back to their
origins. This would lead to unique cultural developments and
adaptations. In the modern age, due to technological
breakthroughs in communication and transportation, migrants remain
connected to their countries of origin. They do not assimilate to
the new culture because it is not immediately necessary. As they
retain their original heritage, and continue to be immersed in a new
society, both sides of the connection endure a uniquely modern cultural
exchange.
|