|
|
Project 4
February 18, 2005 Janelle Senior
Phoenix has been described as “the clean city” (B. Bolin, Environmental Hazard, 2000, p16) in which city developers are trying to “preserve the ‘sunshine and pure atmosphere’ of the oasis” (B. Bolin, Environmental Hazard, 2000, p16). This description is good for selling property and to the new comers of the valley. Reality is that Phoenix’s record is very poor environmentally and Phoenix “is vexed by significant air and groundwater pollution problems” (B. Bolin, Environmental Hazard, 2000, p16). In South Phoenix it’s not unlikely to neither live near a hazardous plant nor come in contact with the fumes of a toxic release or even a toxic/hazardous material spillage like the one downtown last month. The growth of Phoenix is welcomed but the are still some doubts about the equality of Phoenix’s growth an example is the article titled, “Hispanic majority in Phoenix by 2007” (Konig and Kamman, Arizona Republic, 1/22/03). Another example is found in the article, “Parents fear segregation return” (Pearce, AZ. Republic, 11/18/00). Pearce’s article talks about the white’s that are moving to South Phoenix wanting new schools created, so their children would not have to be educated with minorities and low-income children. Phoenix’s growth is welcomed but maybe seen as a one-sided welcome.
o “preserve the ‘sunshine and pure atmosphere’ of the oasis” (B.
Bolin, Environmental Hazard, 2000, p16). This description is good
for selling property and to the new comers of the valley. Reality is
that Phoenix’s record is very poor environmentally and Phoenix “is
vexed by significant air and groundwater pollution problems” (B.
Bolin, Environmental Hazard, 2000, p16). In South Phoenix it’s not
unlikely to neither live near a hazardous plant nor come in contact
with the fumes of a toxic release or even a toxic/hazardous material
spillage like the one downtown last month. |
|
back to South Phoenix 2005 |